Another
popular saying I’ve heard over the years is…
“Call Bible things by Bible names.”
This is a self-defeating
statement. How can one call Bible things by Bible names when the term “Bible”
is not even in the Bible? Have we not by using the term “Bible” called a
Bible thing by a name not found in it? The word “Bible” came from the
seaport town named Byblos from ancient Phoenicia in what is modern day
Lebanon. The Greeks took the name of the city as their word for “book”
from which was later derived “Bible”.
Does anyone else find it odd that
the term “Bible” is not found in the Bible? So I strive to use the term
“Scriptures” in lieu of “Bible”.
How is it that terms not found in
the Scriptures are used to describe such important doctrines that the
Scriptures convey? As much as possible I strive to let the
Scriptures interpret and define itself. I think it wise to strive
to stay away from man-made terms as much as possible yet I confess that having
grown up in the church and having heard such terms as these so often it is a
challenge to refrain from slipping up and using them myself.
Perhaps this popular phrase should be
revised to say,
“Call Scripture things by Scripture names."
16 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work. -2 Timothy 3:16-17 (NKJV)
No comments:
Post a Comment